The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 vs Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 measures 22,3 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 11,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007 at 11,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 tips the scales at 2 381 lbs — 2 273 lbs more than the Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007 at 108 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 has a 190-hp advantage over the Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is rated for 14 passengers, while the Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Zodiac Zoom 340 S 2007 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.