Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 boat specs
Zodiac
Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 boat specs
Zodiac
Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008
2008
View full specs →

Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 vs Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 against a inflatable non rigid Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 measures 22,3 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 14,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 at 8,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 tips the scales at 2 381 lbs — 2 324 lbs more than the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 at 57 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 has a 196-hp advantage over the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008's 4-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is rated for 14 passengers, while the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: Choose the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 14 passengers and at 22,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeZodiac
MakeZodiac
ModelN-ZO 68
ModelZoom 260 Aero
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Beam4 ft. 11 in. (1.50 m)
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Meters1.5
Beam - Inches1
Beam - Inches59
Weight - Detail2,381 lbs. (1,080 kg)
Weight - Detail57 lbs. (26 kg)
Weight - kg1080
Weight - kg25.85
Weight - lbs.2381
Weight - lbs.57
Width [transom] - Detail4 ft. 3 in. (1.3 m) inside width
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Length [deck]19 ft. 1 in. (5.82 m)
Length [deck]not available
Length - Feet22.33
Length - Feet8
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 4 in. (6.8 m)
Length overall - Detail8 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters6.81
Length overall - Meters2.59
Length overall - Inches268
Length overall - Inches102
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters2.6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialRigid inflatable
Hull materialInflatable
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeInflatable Non Rigid
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter2 ft. (0.6 m)
Tube diameternot available
Number of tubes6 airtight compartments
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower150 - 175 hp recommended
Horsepowernot available
Engine max200 hp
Engine max4 hp (3 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity3,263 lbs. (1,480 kg)
Maximum capacityPayload: 772 lbs. (350 kg)
Maximum people14
Maximum people3

Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 vs Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 or the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008?
The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is the longer of the two at 22,3 feet overall. The Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 comes in at 8,0 feet, making it roughly 14,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 or the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008?
For trailering, the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 has the edge at 57 lbs dry weight versus 2 381 lbs for the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 tops out at 4 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 14 passengers, while the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 is certified for 3. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 measures 59" wide, compared to 1" for the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 and Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Zodiac N-ZO 680 2013 and the Zodiac Zoom 260 Aero 2008 are built by Zodiac. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.