When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Zodiac Medline III 2012 and the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Zodiac Medline III 2012 measures 24,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 4,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 at 19,7 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Zodiac Medline III 2012 tips the scales at 3 087 lbs — 2 882 lbs more than the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 at 205 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Zodiac Medline III 2012 has a 100-hp advantage over the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Zodiac Medline III 2012 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Medline III 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
The Zodiac Medline III 2012 has a documented top speed of 53 mph. Speed data wasn't available for the other model.
Both are inflatable designs, which means they pack down for compact storage, can be carried in a bag, and are dramatically lighter than equivalent rigid hulls. The trade-off is setup time and the need to monitor tube pressure regularly. Tube diameter differs: 1 ft. 11 in. (0.575 m) on the Zodiac Medline III 2012 vs 2 ft. (0.6 m) on the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 — larger tubes generally mean more buoyancy and a drier, more stable ride.
Bottom line: Choose the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 19,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Zodiac Medline III 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.