Matching a inflatable rigid Zodiac Cadet RIB 340 2011 against a inflatable non rigid Zodiac Futura Mark II C FR 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Zodiac Cadet RIB 340 2011 at 11,2 ft versus Zodiac Futura Mark II C FR 2013 at 12,2 ft. At 172 lbs and 159 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 25 hp for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 340 2011 and 25 hp for the Zodiac Futura Mark II C FR 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac Futura Mark II C FR 2013 comes in at 6 lbs per hp versus 7 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 340 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Top speed is rated at 30 mph for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 340 2011 and 28 mph for the Zodiac Futura Mark II C FR 2013.
Bottom line: The Zodiac Cadet RIB 340 2011 and Zodiac Futura Mark II C FR 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.