Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 boat specs
Zodiac
Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 boat specs
Zodiac
Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013
2013
View full specs →

Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 vs Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a inflatable rigid Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 against a deep vee Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 measures 19,7 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 9,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 at 10,2 feet (2013). At 192 lbs and 205 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 has a 130-hp advantage over the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013's 20-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Both are inflatable designs, which means they pack down for compact storage, can be carried in a bag, and are dramatically lighter than equivalent rigid hulls. The trade-off is setup time and the need to monitor tube pressure regularly. Tube diameter differs: 1 ft. 6 in. (0.45 m) on the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 vs 2 ft. (0.6 m) on the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 — larger tubes generally mean more buoyancy and a drier, more stable ride.

Bottom line: Choose the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 19,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeZodiac
MakeZodiac
ModelCadet RIB 31
ModelN-ZO 6
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam5 ft. 8 in. (1.72 m)
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Beam - Meters1.73
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Inches68
Beam - Inches1
Weight - Detail192 lbs. (87 kg)
Weight - Detail2,050 lbs. (930 kg)
Weight - kg87.09
Weight - kg929.86
Weight - lbs.192
Weight - lbs.205
Width [transom] - Detail2 ft. 7 in. (0.8 m) inside
Width [transom] - Detail4 ft. 3 in. (1.3 m) inside width
Length [deck]7 ft. 3 in. (2.2 m)
Length [deck]16 ft. 6 in. (5.03 m)
Length - Feet10.17
Length - Feet19.67
Length overall - Detail10 ft. 2 in. (3.1 m)
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 8 in. (5.99 m)
Length overall - Meters3.1
Length overall - Meters5.99
Length overall - Inches122
Length overall - Inches236
Body / Hull
Hull materialInflatable
Hull materialRigid inflatable
Hull typeInflatable Rigid
Hull typeDeep Vee
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter1 ft. 6 in. (0.45 m)
Tube diameter2 ft. (0.6 m)
Number of tubes3 airtight compartments
Number of tubes6 airtight compartments
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower8 - 15 hp recommended
Horsepower115 - 150 hp recommended
Engine max20 hp
Engine max150 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,058 lbs. (480 kg)
Maximum capacity2,782 lbs. (1,262 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people12

Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 vs Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 or the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013?
The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,7 feet overall. The Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 comes in at 10,2 feet, making it roughly 9,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 or the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013?
For trailering, the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 has the edge at 192 lbs dry weight versus 205 lbs for the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 tops out at 20 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 measures 68" wide, compared to 1" for the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 and Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Zodiac Cadet RIB 310 2013 and the Zodiac N-ZO 600 2013 are built by Zodiac. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.