Matching a inflatable rigid Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013 against a deep vee Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 measures 22,9 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 13,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013 at 9,8 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 tips the scales at 333 lbs — 227 lbs less than the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013 at 106 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 has a 240-hp advantage over the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Top speed is rated at 52 mph for the Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 and 21 mph for the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013.
Both are inflatable designs, which means they pack down for compact storage, can be carried in a bag, and are dramatically lighter than equivalent rigid hulls. The trade-off is setup time and the need to monitor tube pressure regularly. Tube diameter differs: 1 ft. 5 in. (0.42 m) on the Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013 vs 2 ft. 2 in. (0.65 m) on the Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 — larger tubes generally mean more buoyancy and a drier, more stable ride.
Bottom line: Choose the Zodiac N-ZO 690 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 22,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Zodiac Cadet Compact 300 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.