Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 boat specs
Zodiac
Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 boat specs
Zodiac
Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013
2013
View full specs →

Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 vs Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 — A Close Look at Two Inflatable Rigids

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 and the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 are inflatable rigid designs with composite construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 at 8,2 ft versus Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 at 8,5 ft. At 84 lbs and 115 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 8 hp for the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 and 10 hp for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 3 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 has a documented top speed of 17 mph. Speed data wasn't available for the other model.

The Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 and Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeZodiac
MakeZodiac
ModelCadet Compact 25
ModelCadet RIB 26
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam5 ft. 4 in. (1.62 m)
Beam5 ft. 1 in. (1.56 m)
Beam - Meters1.63
Beam - Meters1.55
Beam - Inches64
Beam - Inches61
Weight - Detail84 lbs. (38 kg)
Weight - Detail115 lbs. (52 kg)
Weight - kg38.1
Weight - kg52.16
Weight - lbs.84
Weight - lbs.115
Length - Feet8.17
Length - Feet8.5
Length overall - Detail8 ft. 2 in. (2.5 m)
Length overall - Detail8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m)
Length overall - Meters2.49
Length overall - Meters2.59
Length overall - Inches98
Length overall - Inches102
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail2 ft. 4 in. (0.7 m) inside
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]5 ft. 8 in. (1.72 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialInflatable
Hull typeInflatable Rigid
Hull typeInflatable Rigid
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter1 ft. 6 in. (0.45 m)
Tube diameter1 ft. 5 in. (0.42 m)
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes3 airtight compartments
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max8 hp (6 kW)
Engine max10 hp
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower4 - 8 hp recommended
Performance
Maximum speed17 mph (28 km/h)
Maximum speednot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity838 lbs. (380 kg)
Maximum capacity882 lbs. (400 kg)
Maximum people3
Maximum people3

Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 vs Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 or the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013?
The Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 is the longer of the two at 8,5 feet overall. The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 comes in at 8,2 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 or the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013?
For trailering, the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 has the edge at 84 lbs dry weight versus 115 lbs for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 is certified for 3. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 11 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 measures 64" wide, compared to 61" for the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 and Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Zodiac Cadet Compact 250 2010 and the Zodiac Cadet RIB 260 2013 are built by Zodiac. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.