Xpress Striker 17 2013 boat specs
Xpress
Xpress Striker 17 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Xpress XP175PFC 2013 boat specs
Xpress
Xpress XP175PFC 2013
2013
View full specs →

Xpress Striker 17 2013 vs Xpress XP175PFC 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Xpress Striker 17 2013 and the Xpress XP175PFC 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Xpress Striker 17 2013 at 17,0 ft versus Xpress XP175PFC 2013 at 17,0 ft. At 92 lbs and 92 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Xpress Striker 17 2013 and 70 hp for the Xpress XP175PFC 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Xpress XP175PFC 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Xpress Striker 17 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Xpress Striker 17 2013 and Xpress XP175PFC 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeXpress
MakeXpress
ModelStriker 17
ModelXP175PFC
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail920 lbs
Weight - Detail920 lbs
Weight - kg417.3
Weight - kg417.3
Weight - lbs.92
Weight - lbs.92
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Height - DetailSides: 24 in
Height - DetailSides: 24 in
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Inches24
Height - Inches24
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches204
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine modelF40LA
Engine modelF50LA
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine max70 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum people4 / 564 lbs
Maximum people4 / 564 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailBackTrack AWHD17
Trailer - DetailBacktrack AWHD17
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 6 in

Xpress Striker 17 2013 vs Xpress XP175PFC 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Xpress Striker 17 2013 or the Xpress XP175PFC 2013?
The Xpress XP175PFC 2013 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Xpress Striker 17 2013 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Xpress Striker 17 2013 or the Xpress XP175PFC 2013?
For trailering, the Xpress XP175PFC 2013 has the edge at 92 lbs dry weight versus 92 lbs for the Xpress Striker 17 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Xpress XP175PFC 2013 is rated to a maximum of 70 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Xpress Striker 17 2013 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Xpress Striker 17 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Xpress XP175PFC 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Xpress XP175PFC 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Xpress Striker 17 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Xpress Striker 17 2013 and Xpress XP175PFC 2013 share an 86 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the Xpress Striker 17 2013 and Xpress XP175PFC 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Xpress Striker 17 2013 and the Xpress XP175PFC 2013 are built by Xpress. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.