Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 boat specs
Xpress
Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Xpress XP170 2013 boat specs
Xpress
Xpress XP170 2013
2013
View full specs →

Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 vs Xpress XP170 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 against a modified vee Xpress XP170 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 at 15,0 ft versus Xpress XP170 2013 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 tips the scales at 316 lbs — 224 lbs more than the Xpress XP170 2013 at 92 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 70 hp, the Xpress XP170 2013 has a 45-hp advantage over the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Xpress XP170 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Xpress XP170 2013 and its 70-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeXpress
MakeXpress
ModelRecreational - 1546
ModelXP17
Model Year2008
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam66 in
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters1.68
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches66
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail316 lbs
Weight - Detail920 lbs
Weight - kg143.34
Weight - kg417.3
Weight - lbs.316
Weight - lbs.92
Height - Detail18 in
Height - DetailSides: 24 in
Height - Meters0.46
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Inches18
Height - Inches24
Height [transom]16 or 21 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet15
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Meters4.57
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches18
Length overall - Inches204
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.080 in
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp
Engine max70 hp
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelF50LA
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Operational Info
Maximum capacity740 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum people4/500 lbs
Maximum people4 / 564 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailBacktrack AWHD17
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 6 in

Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 vs Xpress XP170 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 or the Xpress XP170 2013?
The Xpress XP170 2013 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 or the Xpress XP170 2013?
For trailering, the Xpress XP170 2013 has the edge at 92 lbs dry weight versus 316 lbs for the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Xpress XP170 2013 is rated to a maximum of 70 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Xpress XP170 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Xpress XP170 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Xpress XP170 2013 measures 86" wide, compared to 66" for the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 and Xpress XP170 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Xpress Recreational - 1546 2008 and the Xpress XP170 2013 are built by Xpress. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.