Xpress H17PFC 2013 boat specs
Xpress
Xpress H17PFC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Xpress H51 2006 boat specs
Xpress
Xpress H51 2006
2006
View full specs →

Xpress H17PFC 2013 vs Xpress H51 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Xpress H17PFC 2013 vs Xpress H51 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Xpress H17PFC 2013 at 17,0 ft versus Xpress H51 2006 at 17,0 ft. At 951 lbs and 905 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Xpress H17PFC 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Xpress H51 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 18 gal and 18 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Xpress H17PFC 2013 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Xpress H51 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Xpress H17PFC 2013 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Xpress H51 2006 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeXpress
MakeXpress
ModelH17PFC
ModelH51
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam88 in
Beam78 in
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters1.98
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches78
Weight - Detail951 lbs
Weight - Detail905 lbs
Weight - kg431.37
Weight - kg410.5
Weight - lbs.951
Weight - lbs.905
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 59 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height - DetailSides: 24 in
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches24
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]22 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches204
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail18 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters45.72
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches18
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine modelF70LA
Engine modelnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max90 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,315 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum people4 / 564 lbs
Maximum people4
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailBacktrack AW17
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. 9 in
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 0 in

Xpress H17PFC 2013 vs Xpress H51 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Xpress H17PFC 2013 or the Xpress H51 2006?
The Xpress H51 2006 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Xpress H17PFC 2013 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Xpress H17PFC 2013 or the Xpress H51 2006?
For trailering, the Xpress H51 2006 has the edge at 905 lbs dry weight versus 951 lbs for the Xpress H17PFC 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Xpress H17PFC 2013 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Xpress H51 2006 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Xpress H17PFC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Xpress H51 2006 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Xpress H17PFC 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 8 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the Xpress H51 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Xpress H17PFC 2013 measures 88" wide, compared to 78" for the Xpress H51 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Xpress H17PFC 2013 and Xpress H51 2006?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 18 gallons and 18 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Xpress H17PFC 2013 and Xpress H51 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Xpress H17PFC 2013 and the Xpress H51 2006 are built by Xpress. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.