Westerly Griffon 2 1982 boat specs
Westerly
Westerly Griffon 2 1982
1982
View full specs →
VS
Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 boat specs
Westerly
Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984
1984
View full specs →

Westerly Griffon 2 1982 vs Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 vs Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Westerly Griffon 2 1982 at 26,0 ft versus Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 at 28,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 tips the scales at 8 036 lbs — 2 136 lbs less than the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 at 5 900 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 carries a rated maximum of 20 hp. Engine data for the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 carries 21 gallons versus 1 gallons in the Westerly Griffon 2 1982. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 displaces 8 036 lbs — a 2 136-lb difference over the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 at 5 900 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Both boats draw a similar depth — 3,3 ft and 3,5 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.

The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 has a documented auxiliary engine of 20 hp.

For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 carries 20 gallons versus 1 gallons on the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 8 036 lbs displacement and 29 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 at 5 900 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail26.00 ft
Length overall - Detail28.80 ft
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet28.8
Length overall - Meters7.92
Length overall - Meters8.78
Length overall - Inches312
Length overall - Inches346
Draft [max] - Detail3.25 ft
Draft [max] - Detail3.50 ft
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Meters1.07
Draft [max] - Inches39
Draft [max] - Inches42
Displacement5900.00 lbs
Displacement8036.00 lbs
Beamnot available
Beam9.11 ft
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters2.78
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches109
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21.4
Fuel tank capacity - Liters3.79
Fuel tank capacity - Liters81.01
Engine makeDiesel
Engine makenot available
Horsepower20 hp
Horsepowernot available
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeinboard
Drive typenot available
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity2
Sleeping capacitynot available
Cabins2
Cabinsnot available
Head1
Headnot available
Water capacity1
Water capacity20.1
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Mast Configurationnot available
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Body / Hull
Ruddernot available
Rudder1 transom hung rudder
Helmnot available
Helm1 tiller
Performance
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed6.51
Maximum speed measurenot available
Maximum speed measureknots

Westerly Griffon 2 1982 vs Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 or the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984?
The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 is the longer of the two at 28,8 feet overall. The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 or the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984?
For trailering, the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 has the edge at 5 900 lbs dry weight versus 8 036 lbs for the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 has a documented max rating of 20 hp. Engine specifications for the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 or the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984?
The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 has the deeper draft at 3,5 ft, versus 3,3 ft for the Westerly Griffon 2 1982. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 or the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 at 8 036 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Westerly Griffon 2 1982 at 5 900 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 carries 20 gallons of fresh water compared to 1 gallons on the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 or the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984?
The Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 has the bigger tank at 21 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Westerly Griffon 2 1982. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 61–102 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 and Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Westerly Griffon 2 1982 and the Westerly Merlin 28 Twin keel Twin keel 1984 are built by Westerly. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.