Matching a modified vee Weld-Craft 1652 DD Econo 2012 against a deep vee Weldcraft Marine 173 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Weld-Craft 1652 DD Econo 2012 at 16,0 ft versus Weldcraft Marine 173 2010 at 17,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Weldcraft Marine 173 2010 tips the scales at 1 305 lbs — 1 298 lbs less than the Weld-Craft 1652 DD Econo 2012 at 7 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Weldcraft Marine 173 2010 has a 35-hp advantage over the Weld-Craft 1652 DD Econo 2012's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Weld-Craft 1652 DD Econo 2012 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Weldcraft Marine 173 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Weldcraft Marine 173 2010 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Weld-Craft 1652 DD Econo 2012 with its 80-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.