Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 boat specs
Weeres
Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon  2007 boat specs
Weeres
Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007
2007
View full specs →

Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 vs Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 — Which Pontoon Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 and the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 measures 16,3 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 14,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 at 2,0 feet (2007). At 93 lbs and 175 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 130 hp, the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 has a 80-hp advantage over the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeWeeres
MakeWeeres
ModelCadet Fish 160 - 7
ModelSuntanner 200 Tri-toon
Model Year2013
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft
Beamnot available
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail930 lbs
Weight - Detail1,750 lbs
Weight - kg421.84
Weight - kg793.79
Weight - lbs.93
Weight - lbs.175
Length [deck]16 ft
Length [deck]8 ft. x 20 ft. Enclosed: 8 ft. x 18 ft
Length - Feet16.25
Length - Feet2
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Inches195
Length overall - Inches24
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter21 in
Tube diameter23 in
Tube gauge0.080 in
Tube gauge0.08
Number of tubes2
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max50 hp
Engine max130 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Operational Info
Maximum capacity985 lbs
Maximum capacity3,805 lbs
Maximum people7
Maximum people11

Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 vs Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 or the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007?
The Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 is the longer of the two at 16,3 feet overall. The Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 14,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 or the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007?
For trailering, the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 has the edge at 93 lbs dry weight versus 175 lbs for the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 is rated to a maximum of 130 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 is certified for 11. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Are the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 and Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Weeres Cadet Fish 160 - 7 2013 and the Weeres Suntanner 200 Tri-toon 2007 are built by Weeres. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.