The Walker Bay 310 FT/FTH 2006 vs Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007 measures 11,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 10,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Walker Bay 310 FT/FTH 2006 at 1,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007 tips the scales at 137 lbs — 125 lbs less than the Walker Bay 310 FT/FTH 2006 at 12 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 15 hp for the Walker Bay 310 FT/FTH 2006 and 25 hp for the Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Walker Bay 310 FT/FTH 2006 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Walker Bay 310 FT/FTH 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 6 lbs per hp for the Walker Bay 340 FTD/FTDH 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.