Velocity 290 SC 2007 boat specs
Velocity
Velocity 290 SC 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Velocity 300 Xover 2010 boat specs
Velocity
Velocity 300 Xover 2010
2010
View full specs →

Velocity 290 SC 2007 vs Velocity 300 Xover 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Velocity 290 SC 2007 vs Velocity 300 Xover 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Velocity 290 SC 2007 measures 28,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 25,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Velocity 300 Xover 2010 at 3,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Velocity 290 SC 2007 tips the scales at 465 lbs — 408 lbs more than the Velocity 300 Xover 2010 at 57 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 500 hp, the Velocity 290 SC 2007 has a 498-hp advantage over the Velocity 300 Xover 2010's 2-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Velocity 300 Xover 2010 carries 22 gallons versus 8 gallons in the Velocity 290 SC 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Velocity 290 SC 2007 at 28,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Velocity 300 Xover 2010 at 3,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeVelocity
MakeVelocity
Model290 SC
Model300 Xover
Model Year2007
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 2 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail4,650 lbs
Weight - Detail5,700 lbs. with top and twin 300 hp Opti Max
Weight - kg2109.2
Weight - kg2585.47
Weight - lbs.465
Weight - lbs.57
Length - Feet28
Length - Feet3
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length [over all with swim platform]28 ft. 6 in
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 8 in. with top down 8 ft. garage clearance with top down
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.44
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches96
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail30 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters9.14
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches36
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail220 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters832.79
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal22
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max500 hp
Engine maxnot available
Max no of enginesnot available
Max no of engines2
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower(2) 300 hp
Performance
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed79 mph with top down 77 mph with top up
Operational Info
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail10 gal
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters37.85
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal1
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all35 ft. 0 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight7,200 lbs

Velocity 290 SC 2007 vs Velocity 300 Xover 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Velocity 290 SC 2007 or the Velocity 300 Xover 2010?
The Velocity 290 SC 2007 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Velocity 300 Xover 2010 comes in at 3,0 feet, making it roughly 25,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Velocity 290 SC 2007 or the Velocity 300 Xover 2010?
For trailering, the Velocity 300 Xover 2010 has the edge at 57 lbs dry weight versus 465 lbs for the Velocity 290 SC 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Velocity 290 SC 2007 is rated to a maximum of 500 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Velocity 300 Xover 2010 tops out at 2 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Velocity 300 Xover 2010 carry?
The Velocity 300 Xover 2010 has an official capacity rating of 9 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Velocity 300 Xover 2010 measures 102" wide, compared to 98" for the Velocity 290 SC 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Velocity 290 SC 2007 or the Velocity 300 Xover 2010?
The Velocity 300 Xover 2010 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 8 gallons on the Velocity 290 SC 2007. That 14-gallon difference translates to roughly 42–70 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Velocity 290 SC 2007 and Velocity 300 Xover 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Velocity 290 SC 2007 and the Velocity 300 Xover 2010 are built by Velocity. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.