Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 boat specs
Ultracraft
Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 boat specs
Ultracraft
Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008
2008
View full specs →

Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 vs Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 vs Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 at 14,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 406 lbs less than the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 at 69 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 has a 45-hp advantage over the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 16 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 with its 30-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeUltracraft
MakeUltracraft
ModelStealth 160C Console
ModelVoyager 14CT (Tiller)
Model Year2006
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam85 in
Beam72 in
Beam - Meters2.16
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Inches85
Beam - Inches72
Deadrise13℃
Deadrisenot available
Weight - Detail690 lbs
Weight - Detail475 lbs
Weight - kg312.98
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - lbs.69
Weight - lbs.475
Height - DetailBow: 39 in. Stern: 33 in
Height - DetailBow: 31 in
Height - Meters0.99
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Inches39
Height - Inches31
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet14
Length - Inches2
Length - Inches1
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters4.29
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches169
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.080 in
Hull thickness0.063 in. (bottm and sides)
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Engine and Drivetrain
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max30 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum capacity1,050 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 vs Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 or the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008?
The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 or the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008?
For trailering, the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 has the edge at 69 lbs dry weight versus 475 lbs for the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 tops out at 30 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 16 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 measures 85" wide, compared to 72" for the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 and Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ultracraft Stealth 160C Console 2006 and the Ultracraft Voyager 14CT (Tiller) 2008 are built by Ultracraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.