Ultracraft 178W 2011 boat specs
Ultracraft
Ultracraft 178W 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 boat specs
Ultracraft
Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007
2007
View full specs →

Ultracraft 178W 2011 vs Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ultracraft 178W 2011 vs Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ultracraft 178W 2011 at 17,7 ft versus Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 at 15,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 tips the scales at 525 lbs — 413 lbs less than the Ultracraft 178W 2011 at 112 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Ultracraft 178W 2011 has a 75-hp advantage over the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Ultracraft 178W 2011 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Ultracraft 178W 2011 at 17,7 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 at 15,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeUltracraft
MakeUltracraft
Model178W
ModelVoyager 16CT (Tiller)
Model Year2011
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in
Beam72 in
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches72
Deadrise15℃
Deadrisenot available
Weight - Detail1,120 lbs
Weight - Detail525 lbs
Weight - kg508.02
Weight - kg238.14
Weight - lbs.112
Weight - lbs.525
Height - DetailBow: 36 in. Stern: 28 in
Height - DetailBow: 33 in
Height - Meters0.91
Height - Meters0.84
Height - Inches36
Height - Inches33
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet17.67
Length - Feet15
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Meters5.38
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Inches212
Length overall - Inches19
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.09 in
Hull thickness0.063 in. (bottm and sides)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Maximum capacity1,175 lbs
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

Ultracraft 178W 2011 vs Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ultracraft 178W 2011 or the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007?
The Ultracraft 178W 2011 is the longer of the two at 17,7 feet overall. The Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 2,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ultracraft 178W 2011 or the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007?
For trailering, the Ultracraft 178W 2011 has the edge at 112 lbs dry weight versus 525 lbs for the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ultracraft 178W 2011 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ultracraft 178W 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Ultracraft 178W 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ultracraft 178W 2011 measures 95" wide, compared to 72" for the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Ultracraft 178W 2011 and Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ultracraft 178W 2011 and the Ultracraft Voyager 16CT (Tiller) 2007 are built by Ultracraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.