Ultracraft 166C 2010 boat specs
Ultracraft
Ultracraft 166C 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Ultracraft 167T 2009 boat specs
Ultracraft
Ultracraft 167T 2009
2009
View full specs →

Ultracraft 166C 2010 vs Ultracraft 167T 2009 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ultracraft 166C 2010 and the Ultracraft 167T 2009 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ultracraft 166C 2010 at 16,5 ft versus Ultracraft 167T 2009 at 16,0 ft. At 72 lbs and 74 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Ultracraft 166C 2010 and 60 hp for the Ultracraft 167T 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 16 gal and 16 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Ultracraft 166C 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft 167T 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Ultracraft 166C 2010 and Ultracraft 167T 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeUltracraft
MakeUltracraft
Model166C
Model167T
Model Year201
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam80 in
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches8
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail720 lbs
Weight - Detail740 lbs
Weight - kg326.59
Weight - kg335.66
Weight - lbs.72
Weight - lbs.74
Height - DetailBow: 32 in
Height - Detail33 in
Height - Meters0.81
Height - Meters0.84
Height - Inches32
Height - Inches33
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16.5
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 7 in
Length overall - Meters5.03
Length overall - Meters5.05
Length overall - Inches198
Length overall - Inches199
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches7
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.08 in
Hull thickness0.142 in. bow / bottom 0.080 in. sides
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max60 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,320 lbs
Maximum capacity1,380 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Ultracraft 166C 2010 vs Ultracraft 167T 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ultracraft 166C 2010 or the Ultracraft 167T 2009?
The Ultracraft 166C 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,5 feet overall. The Ultracraft 167T 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ultracraft 166C 2010 or the Ultracraft 167T 2009?
For trailering, the Ultracraft 166C 2010 has the edge at 72 lbs dry weight versus 74 lbs for the Ultracraft 167T 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ultracraft 166C 2010 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ultracraft 167T 2009 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ultracraft 166C 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ultracraft 167T 2009 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Ultracraft 166C 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft 167T 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ultracraft 167T 2009 measures 86" wide, compared to 8" for the Ultracraft 166C 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Ultracraft 166C 2010 and Ultracraft 167T 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 16 gallons and 16 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Ultracraft 166C 2010 and Ultracraft 167T 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ultracraft 166C 2010 and the Ultracraft 167T 2009 are built by Ultracraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.