When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ultracraft 14CT 2012 and the Ultracraft 164T 2009 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ultracraft 14CT 2012 at 14,1 ft versus Ultracraft 164T 2009 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ultracraft 14CT 2012 tips the scales at 475 lbs — 413 lbs more than the Ultracraft 164T 2009 at 62 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Ultracraft 164T 2009 has a 57-hp advantage over the Ultracraft 14CT 2012's 3-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Ultracraft 164T 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 158 lbs per hp for the Ultracraft 14CT 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ultracraft 164T 2009 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ultracraft 14CT 2012 with its 3-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.