Matching a deep vee Triumph Boats 170 CC 2010 against a flat Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Triumph Boats 170 CC 2010 at 16,8 ft versus Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013 at 17,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013 tips the scales at 1 647 lbs — 1 636 lbs less than the Triumph Boats 170 CC 2010 at 11 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Triumph Boats 170 CC 2010 and 90 hp for the Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 21 gal and 24 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Triumph Boats 170 CC 2010 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Triumph Boats 170 CC 2010 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 18 lbs per hp for the Triumph Boats 1700 Skiff CC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.