Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 boat specs
Triton Boats
Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 boat specs
Triton Boats
Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011
2011
View full specs →

Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 vs Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 against a flat Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 measures 19,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 3,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 at 15,8 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 tips the scales at 2 074 lbs — 2 029 lbs more than the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 at 45 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 135 hp, the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 has a 100-hp advantage over the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011's 35-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 15,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeTriton Boats
MakeTriton Boats
Model192 Allure
ModelA162 SFB-MT
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam99 in
Beam75 in. (1.91 m)
Beam - Meters2.51
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches99
Beam - Inches75
Weight - Detail2,074 lbs
Weight - Detail450 lbs. (204 kg)
Weight - kg940.75
Weight - kg204.12
Weight - lbs.2074
Weight - lbs.45
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet15.83
Length overall - Detail19 ft
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in. (4.82 m)
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Inches228
Length overall - Inches19
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail21 in. (0.53 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches21
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail52 in. (1.32 m) bottom
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.5 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeFlat
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.83 mm)
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower135 - 200 hp
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max35 hp (26 kW) tiller 50 hp (37 kW) remote
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. Built-in Ice Chest: 20 qt
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,900 lbs
Maximum capacity1,216 lbs. (552 kg)
Maximum people1,245 lbs
Maximum people5 / 715 lbs. (324 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. with swing tongue 24 ft. without swing tongue
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. (6.1 m)

Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 vs Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 or the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011?
The Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 comes in at 15,8 feet, making it roughly 3,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 or the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011?
For trailering, the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 has the edge at 45 lbs dry weight versus 2 074 lbs for the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 is rated to a maximum of 135 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 tops out at 35 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 1 passengers, while the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 measures 99" wide, compared to 75" for the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 and Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Triton Boats 192 Allure 2013 and the Triton Boats A162 SFB-MT 2011 are built by Triton Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.