Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 boat specs
Triton Boats
Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 boat specs
Triton Boats
Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006
2006
View full specs →

Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 vs Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 vs Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 at 18,3 ft versus Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 at 19,0 ft. At 101 lbs and 165 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 has a 125-hp advantage over the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 carries 55 gallons versus 21 gallons in the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeTriton Boats
MakeTriton Boats
Model1862 CC
Model190 LTS
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches9
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise10°
Deadrise15℃
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches22
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,010 lbs
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs
Weight - kg458.13
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - lbs.101
Weight - lbs.165
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 62 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Length - Feet18.33
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Inches22
Length overall - Inches228
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail8 ft. 2 in
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.49
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches98
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail13 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.33
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches13
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]25 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.10 ga
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower25 - 90 hp
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max150 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 vs Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 or the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006?
The Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 comes in at 18,3 feet, making it roughly 0,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 or the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006?
For trailering, the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 has the edge at 101 lbs dry weight versus 165 lbs for the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 measures 102" wide, compared to 9" for the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 or the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006?
The Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 has the bigger tank at 55 gallons, versus 21 gallons on the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013. That 34-gallon difference translates to roughly 102–170 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 and Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Triton Boats 1862 CC 2013 and the Triton Boats 190 LTS 2006 are built by Triton Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.