Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 vs Tracker V-17 WT 2003 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 or the Tracker V-17 WT 2003?

For trailering, the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 has the edge at 13 lbs dry weight versus 1 792 lbs for the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker V-17 WT 2003 tops out at 125 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 measures 96" wide, compared to 92" for the Tracker V-17 WT 2003. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: How do the fuel tanks compare on the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 and Tracker V-17 WT 2003?

Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 4 gallons and 3 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.

Q: Are the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 and Tracker V-17 WT 2003 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 and the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 vs Tracker V-17 WT 2003

Tracker

Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005

2005

View full specs →

Tracker

Tracker V-17 WT 2003

2003

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 vs Tracker V-17 WT 2003 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 vs Tracker V-17 WT 2003 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 has a 75-hp advantage over the Tracker V-17 WT 2003's 125-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 4 gal and 3 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 19,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Tracker V-17 WT 2003 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeTracker

ModelTundra? 20 Sport

ModelV-17 WT

Model Year2005

Model Year2003

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam96 in

Beam92 in

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Meters2.34

Beam - Inches96

Beam - Inches92

Depth - Detail27 in

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Centimeters68.58

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Inches27

Depth - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail1,792 lbs

Weight - Detail1300 Lbs

Weight - kg812.84

Weight - kg589.67

Weight - lbs.1792

Weight - lbs.13

Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 74 in

Width [transom] - Detailnot available

Height [transom]25.5 in

Height [transom]20 in

Length - Feet19

Length - Feetnot available

Length - Inches8

Length - Inchesnot available

Length overall - Detail19 ft. 8 in

Length overall - Detail17 ft. 4 in

Length overall - Meters5.99

Length overall - Meters5.28

Length overall - Inches236

Length overall - Inches208

Height - Detailnot available

Height - Detail23 in

Height - Metersnot available

Height - Meters0.58

Height - Inchesnot available

Height - Inches23

Body / Hull

Hull materialAluminum

Hull thickness0.125

Hull thicknessnot available

Engine and Drivetrain

Engine/s standardMercury? 150 XL

Engine/s standardnot available

Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 Gallons

Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42

Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56

Fuel tank capacity - Gal4

Fuel tank capacity - Gal3

Drive typeOutboard

Drive typenot available

Engine max200 hp

Engine max125 HP

Operational Info

Maximum capacity2,290 lbs

Maximum capacity1450 Lbs

Maximum people9

Maximum people6 Persons

Trailer Info

Trailer - DetailTrailstar Drive-On Trailer w/ Swing-Away Tongue

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - Length over allw/ Transom Saver 23 ft. 0 in

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in

Trailer - Widthnot available

Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 vs Tracker V-17 WT 2003 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 or the Tracker V-17 WT 2003?

For trailering, the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 has the edge at 13 lbs dry weight versus 1 792 lbs for the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker V-17 WT 2003 tops out at 125 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 measures 96" wide, compared to 92" for the Tracker V-17 WT 2003. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

How do the fuel tanks compare on the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 and Tracker V-17 WT 2003?

Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 4 gallons and 3 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.

Are the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 and Tracker V-17 WT 2003 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 and the Tracker V-17 WT 2003 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Tracker Tundra 20 Sport 2005 full specs ← Tracker V-17 WT 2003 full specs