Matching a flat Tracker Topper™ 1036 Riveted Jon 2013 against a deep vee Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 measures 21,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 11,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Tracker Topper™ 1036 Riveted Jon 2013 at 9,8 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 tips the scales at 1 965 lbs — 1 866 lbs less than the Tracker Topper™ 1036 Riveted Jon 2013 at 99 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 275 hp, the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 has a 272-hp advantage over the Tracker Topper™ 1036 Riveted Jon 2013's 3-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Tracker Topper™ 1036 Riveted Jon 2013 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 21,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Tracker Topper™ 1036 Riveted Jon 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.