The Tracker Pro 165 2011 is a modified-V design and the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 is a deep-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 measures 21,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 4,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Tracker Pro 165 2011 at 16,2 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 tips the scales at 1 965 lbs - 1 220 lbs less than the Tracker Pro 165 2011 at 745 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 275 hp, the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 has a 235-hp advantage over the Tracker Pro 165 2011's 40-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 carries 60 gallons versus 9 gallons in the Tracker Pro 165 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Tracker Pro 165 2011 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker Tundra 21 WT 2009 could be the deciding factor.