Tracker Pro 16 2010 vs Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Pro 16 2010 or the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003?

For trailering, the Tracker Pro 16 2010 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 1 792 lbs for the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker Pro 16 2010 tops out at 30 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Tracker Pro 16 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 measures 96" wide, compared to 7" for the Tracker Pro 16 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: How do the fuel tanks compare on the Tracker Pro 16 2010 and Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003?

Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 6 gallons and 4 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.

Q: Are the Tracker Pro 16 2010 and Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Tracker Pro 16 2010 and the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Tracker Pro 16 2010 vs Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003

Tracker

Tracker Pro 16 2010

2010

View full specs →

Tracker

Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003

2003

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Tracker Pro 16 2010 vs Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker Pro 16 2010 vs Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 has a 170-hp advantage over the Tracker Pro 16 2010's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 6 gal and 4 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Tracker Pro 16 2010 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 0,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Tracker Pro 16 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeTracker

ModelPro 16

ModelTundra 20 WT

Model Year201

Model Year2003

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam70 in

Beam96 in

Beam - Meters1.78

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Inches7

Beam - Inches96

Weight - Detail680 lbs

Weight - Detail1792 Lbs

Weight - kg308.44

Weight - kg812.84

Weight - lbs.68

Weight - lbs.1792

Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 48 in

Width [transom] - Detailnot available

Height [transom]21 in

Height [transom]25.5 in

Length - Feet16.08

Length - Feetnot available

Length overall - Detail16.08 ft

Length overall - Detail19 ft. 8 in

Length overall - Meters4.9

Length overall - Meters5.99

Length overall - Inches192.96

Length overall - Inches236

Height - Detailnot available

Height - Detail27 in

Height - Metersnot available

Height - Meters0.69

Height - Inchesnot available

Height - Inches27

Body / Hull

Hull materialAluminum

Hull thickness0.090 in

Hull thicknessnot available

Hull typeModified Vee

Hull typenot available

Engine and Drivetrain

Engine makeMercury®

Engine makenot available

Engine model20 EL FourStroke EFI

Engine modelnot available

Fuel tank capacity - Detail6 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 Gallons

Fuel tank capacity - Liters22.71

Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42

Fuel tank capacity - Gal6

Fuel tank capacity - Gal4

Fuel typeGas

Fuel typenot available

Drive typeOutboard

Drive typenot available

Engine max30 hp

Engine max200 HP

Operational Info

Maximum capacity855 lbs

Maximum capacity2290 Lbs

Maximum people3 / 435 lbs

Maximum people9 Persons

Trailer Info

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 9 in

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Trailer - Weight1,195 lbs

Trailer - Weightnot available

Trailer - Width5 ft. 11 in

Trailer - Widthnot available

Tracker Pro 16 2010 vs Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Pro 16 2010 or the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003?

For trailering, the Tracker Pro 16 2010 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 1 792 lbs for the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker Pro 16 2010 tops out at 30 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Tracker Pro 16 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 measures 96" wide, compared to 7" for the Tracker Pro 16 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

How do the fuel tanks compare on the Tracker Pro 16 2010 and Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003?

Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 6 gallons and 4 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.

Are the Tracker Pro 16 2010 and Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Tracker Pro 16 2010 and the Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Tracker Pro 16 2010 full specs ← Tracker Tundra 20 WT 2003 full specs