Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009
2009
View full specs →

Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 vs Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 against a modified vee Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 at 16,0 ft versus Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 tips the scales at 655 lbs — 600 lbs more than the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 at 55 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 and 23 hp for the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 16 lbs per hp for the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 and its 40-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 with its 23-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelGuide V-16 Laker Deep V
ModelMarsh Hunter 1648
Model Year2011
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam76 in
Beam63 in
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Meters1.6
Beam - Inches76
Beam - Inches63
Deadrise8°
Deadrisenot available
Weight - Detail655 lbs
Weight - Detail550 lbs
Weight - kg297.1
Weight - kg249.48
Weight - lbs.655
Weight - lbs.55
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 48 in
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]16 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMud Buddy
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelSport Short
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower23 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum capacity900 lbs
Maximum people4 / 750 lbs
Maximum people4 / 475 lbs

Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 vs Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 or the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009?
The Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 or the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009?
For trailering, the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 has the edge at 55 lbs dry weight versus 655 lbs for the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 tops out at 23 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 2 lbs per hp compared to 16 lbs per hp for the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 measures 76" wide, compared to 63" for the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 and Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2011 and the Tracker Marsh Hunter 1648 2009 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.