Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008
2008
View full specs →

Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 vs Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 is a modified-V design and the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 is a deep-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 at 17,0 ft versus Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 tips the scales at 650 lbs - 335 lbs more than the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 at 315 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 has a 35-hp advantage over the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008's 40-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelGRIZZLY? 1754 SC
ModelGuide V16 Riveted Deep V
Model Year2010
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam78 in.
Beam67 in.
Beam - Meters1.98
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Inches78
Beam - Inches67
Weight - Detail650 lbs.
Weight - Detail315 lbs.
Weight - kg294.83
Weight - kg142.88
Weight - lbs.650
Weight - lbs.315
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 54 in.
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 48 in.
Height [transom]20 in.
Height [transom]20 in.
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail17.0 ft.
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in.
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches195
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches3
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.10 in.
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine modelMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower50 ELPTO TwoStroke
Horsepowernot available
Engine max75 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs.
Maximum capacity1,110 lbs.
Maximum people5 / 740 lbs.
Maximum people5 @ 694 lbs.

Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 vs Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 or the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 or the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008?
For trailering, the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 has the edge at 315 lbs dry weight versus 650 lbs for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 8 lbs per hp compared to 9 lbs per hp for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane - the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 measures 78" wide, compared to 67" for the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 and Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 SC 2010 and the Tracker Guide V16 Riveted Deep V 2008 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.