Both the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 and the Tracker Pro 16 2010 are modified-V designs, both built in aluminium, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 at 17,0 ft versus Tracker Pro 16 2010 at 16,1 ft. At 606 lbs and 680 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 has a 30-hp advantage over the Tracker Pro 16 2010's 30-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Tracker Pro 16 2010 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 23 lbs per hp for the Tracker Pro 16 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Tracker GRIZZLY 1754 AWL 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 7 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Tracker Pro 16 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.