Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003
2003
View full specs →
VS
Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Pro Team 185 2004
2004
View full specs →

Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 vs Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 vs Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 has a 65-hp advantage over the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 with its 50-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelGrizzly 1654 SC
ModelPro Team? 185
Model Year2003
Model Year2004
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam76 in
Beam83 in
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches76
Beam - Inches83
Weight - Detail690 Lbs
Weight - Detail1022 lbs
Weight - kg312.98
Weight - kg463.57
Weight - lbs.69
Weight - lbs.1022
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Meters5.56
Length overall - Inches196
Length overall - Inches219
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]22 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine max50 HP
Engine max115 HP
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gallons
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1135 Lbs
Maximum capacity1235 lbs
Maximum people5 Persons
Maximum people5 Persons

Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 vs Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 or the Tracker Pro Team 185 2004?
For trailering, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 has the edge at 69 lbs dry weight versus 1 022 lbs for the Tracker Pro Team 185 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 measures 83" wide, compared to 76" for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 and Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 and the Tracker Pro Team 185 2004 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.