Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003
2003
View full specs →
VS
Tracker H 1700 2007 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker H 1700 2007
2007
View full specs →

Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 vs Tracker H 1700 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 vs Tracker H 1700 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Tracker H 1700 2007 has a 40-hp advantage over the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Tracker H 1700 2007 and its 90-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 with its 50-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelGrizzly 1654 SC
ModelH 17
Model Year2003
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam76 in
Beam88 in
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches76
Beam - Inches88
Weight - Detail690 Lbs
Weight - Detailnot available
Weight - kg312.98
Weight - kgnot available
Weight - lbs.69
Weight - lbs.not available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Meters5.08
Length overall - Inches196
Length overall - Inches2
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise12℃
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feetnot available
Length - Feet16
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches8
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.160 in. Side Thickness: 0.102 in
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine max50 HP
Engine max90 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury? 50 ELPTO TwoStroke
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1135 Lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people5 Persons
Maximum peoplenot available
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailCustom welded 1-axle galvanized trailer

Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 vs Tracker H 1700 2007 — Common Questions

Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker H 1700 2007 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Tracker H 1700 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker H 1700 2007 measures 88" wide, compared to 76" for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 and Tracker H 1700 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2003 and the Tracker H 1700 2007 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.