Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013
2013
View full specs →

Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 vs Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 against a flat Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 at 14,0 ft versus Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 at 11,9 ft. At 44 lbs and 111 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 25 hp for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 and 5 hp for the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 is rated for 4 passengers, while the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 22 lbs per hp for the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 4 passengers and at 14,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelGRIZZLY? 1448 AWL
ModelTopper™ 1236 Riveted Jon
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in
Beam52 in
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters1.32
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches52
Weight - Detail440 lbs
Weight - Detail111 lbs
Weight - kg199.58
Weight - kg50.35
Weight - lbs.44
Weight - lbs.111
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 48 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 36 in
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]15.5 in
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet11.92
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail11 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters3.63
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches143
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.10 in
Hull thickness0.050 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp
Engine max5 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity885 lbs
Maximum capacity480 lbs
Maximum people4 / 512 lbs
Maximum people3 / 365 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightPackage: 205 lbs

Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 vs Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 or the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 is the longer of the two at 14,0 feet overall. The Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 comes in at 11,9 feet, making it roughly 2,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 or the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013?
For trailering, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 has the edge at 44 lbs dry weight versus 111 lbs for the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 is rated to a maximum of 25 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 tops out at 5 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 is certified for 3. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 2 lbs per hp compared to 22 lbs per hp for the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 measures 52" wide, compared to 7" for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 and Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AWL 2009 and the Tracker Topper™ 1236 Riveted Jon 2013 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.