Matching a flat Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW S Flat Bottom 2007 against a modified vee Tracker Pro 160 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW S Flat Bottom 2007 at 14,0 ft versus Tracker Pro 160 2013 at 16,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker Pro 160 2013 tips the scales at 719 lbs — 683 lbs less than the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW S Flat Bottom 2007 at 36 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 25 hp for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW S Flat Bottom 2007 and 40 hp for the Tracker Pro 160 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 3 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW S Flat Bottom 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 18 lbs per hp for the Tracker Pro 160 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Tracker Pro 160 2013 at 16,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW S Flat Bottom 2007 at 14,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.