Matching a flat Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW L Flat Bottom 2007 against a modified vee Tracker Pro 170 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW L Flat Bottom 2007 at 14,0 ft versus Tracker Pro 170 2013 at 16,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker Pro 170 2013 tips the scales at 878 lbs — 842 lbs less than the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW L Flat Bottom 2007 at 36 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Tracker Pro 170 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW L Flat Bottom 2007's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker Pro 170 2013 is rated for 4 passengers, while the Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW L Flat Bottom 2007 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker Pro 170 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1448 AW L Flat Bottom 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 18 lbs per hp for the Tracker Pro 170 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.