Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Bantam DLX 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012
2012
View full specs →

Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 vs Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 vs Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 measures 16,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 7,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 at 9,0 feet (2005). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 tips the scales at 655 lbs — 570 lbs less than the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 at 85 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 has a 35-hp advantage over the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005's 5-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 is rated for 4 passengers, while the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 comes in at 16 lbs per hp versus 17 lbs per hp for the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 4 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelBantam? DLX
ModelGuide V-16 Laker Deep V
Model Year2005
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam48 in
Beam74 in
Beam - Meters1.22
Beam - Meters1.88
Beam - Inches48
Beam - Inches74
Weight - Detail85 lbs
Weight - Detail655 lbs
Weight - kg38.56
Weight - kg297.1
Weight - lbs.85
Weight - lbs.655
Length - Feet9
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail9 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Meters2.9
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches114
Length overall - Inches192
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise8°
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]21 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine max5 hp
Engine max40 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity500 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum people2
Maximum people4 / 750 lbs
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee

Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 vs Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 or the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 comes in at 9,0 feet, making it roughly 7,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 or the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012?
For trailering, the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 has the edge at 85 lbs dry weight versus 655 lbs for the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 tops out at 5 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 16 lbs per hp compared to 17 lbs per hp for the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 measures 74" wide, compared to 48" for the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 and Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Tracker Bantam DLX 2005 and the Tracker Guide V-16 Laker Deep V 2012 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.