Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker Avalanche DC 2003
2003
View full specs →
VS
Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 boat specs
Tracker
Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004
2004
View full specs →

Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 vs Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 vs Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 has a 115-hp advantage over the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeTracker
MakeTracker
ModelAvalanche DC
ModelGRIZZLY? 1654 SC
Model Year2003
Model Year2004
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam76 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches76
Weight - Detail1370 Lbs
Weight - Detail690 Lbs
Weight - kg621.42
Weight - kg312.98
Weight - lbs.137
Weight - lbs.69
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]not available
Length overall - Detail18 ft 2 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters0.05
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Inches2
Length overall - Inches196
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail41 Gallons
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters155.2
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal41
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Engine max175 HP
Engine max60 HP
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1500 Lbs
Maximum capacity1235 Lbs
Maximum people5 Persons
Maximum people5 Persons

Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 vs Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 or the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004?
For trailering, the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 has the edge at 69 lbs dry weight versus 137 lbs for the Tracker Avalanche DC 2003. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 measures 96" wide, compared to 76" for the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 and Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Tracker Avalanche DC 2003 and the Tracker GRIZZLY 1654 SC 2004 are built by Tracker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.