ThunderJet Luxor 2012 boat specs
ThunderJet
ThunderJet Luxor 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
ThunderJet Luxor 2013 boat specs
ThunderJet
ThunderJet Luxor 2013
2013
View full specs →

ThunderJet Luxor 2012 vs ThunderJet Luxor 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 and the ThunderJet Luxor 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — ThunderJet Luxor 2012 at 19,0 ft versus ThunderJet Luxor 2013 at 19,0 ft. At 24 lbs and 24 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 320 hp, the ThunderJet Luxor 2013 has a 288-hp advantage over the ThunderJet Luxor 2012's 32-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 48 gal and 48 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the ThunderJet Luxor 2013 and its 320-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 with its 32-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeThunderJet
MakeThunderJet
ModelLuxor
ModelLuxor
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90 in
Beam90 in
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches9
Beam - Inches9
Deadrise12&#176
Deadrise12&#176
Weight - Detail2,400 lbs
Weight - Detail2,400 lbs
Weight - kg1088.62
Weight - kg1088.62
Weight - lbs.24
Weight - lbs.24
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 72 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 72 in
Height - DetailSides: 31 in
Height - DetailSides: 31 in
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Inches31
Height - Inches31
Height [transom]31 in
Height [transom]31 in
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail19 ft
Length overall - Detail19 ft
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Inches228
Length overall - Inches228
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSides: 0.125 in. Bottom: 0.250 in. Transom: 0.190 in
Hull thicknessSides: 0.125 in. Bottom: 0.25 in. Transom: 0.19 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard350 cid multi port fuel injected GM Vortec closed cooling system
Engine/s standardnot available
Jet pumpAmerican Turbine SD309 mixed flow jet pur with split duct reverse bucket
Jet pumpAmerican Turbine SD309 mixed flow with split duct reverse bucket
Fuel tank capacity - Detail48 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail48 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters181.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters181.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal48
Fuel tank capacity - Gal48
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeJet Drive
Drive typeJet Drive
Horsepower32
Horsepower320 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeGM
Engine modelnot available
Engine model350 cid multi-port fuel injected Vortec
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGateway 5,300 lbs. capacity galvanized tandem axle bunk
Trailer - DetailGateway 5,300 lb. capacity galvanized tandem axle bunk

ThunderJet Luxor 2012 vs ThunderJet Luxor 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 or the ThunderJet Luxor 2013?
The ThunderJet Luxor 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The ThunderJet Luxor 2012 comes in at 19,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 or the ThunderJet Luxor 2013?
For trailering, the ThunderJet Luxor 2013 has the edge at 24 lbs dry weight versus 24 lbs for the ThunderJet Luxor 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The ThunderJet Luxor 2013 is rated to a maximum of 320 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The ThunderJet Luxor 2012 tops out at 32 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The ThunderJet Luxor 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the ThunderJet Luxor 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 and ThunderJet Luxor 2013 share an 90 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 and ThunderJet Luxor 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 48 gallons and 48 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 and ThunderJet Luxor 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the ThunderJet Luxor 2012 and the ThunderJet Luxor 2013 are built by ThunderJet. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.