Matching a modified vee ThunderJet Luxor 2009 against a deep vee ThunderJet V182-Eco 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — ThunderJet Luxor 2009 at 19,0 ft versus ThunderJet V182-Eco 2013 at 18,2 ft. At 26 lbs and 117 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the ThunderJet V182-Eco 2013 has a 90-hp advantage over the ThunderJet Luxor 2009's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the ThunderJet V182-Eco 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 5 gallons in the ThunderJet Luxor 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the ThunderJet V182-Eco 2013 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the ThunderJet Luxor 2009 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.