Matching a modified vee ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010 against a deep vee ThunderJet V182-Eco 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The ThunderJet V182-Eco 2012 measures 18,2 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 16,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010 at 2,0 feet (2010). At 18 lbs and 117 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The ThunderJet V182-Eco 2012 tops out at 115 hp. Engine specs for the ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the ThunderJet V182-Eco 2012 carries 32 gallons versus 5 gallons in the ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the ThunderJet V182-Eco 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the ThunderJet Luxor OB 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The ThunderJet V182-Eco 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.