Matching a modified vee ThunderJet Havasu 2010 against a deep vee ThunderJet V162-Eco 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The ThunderJet V162-Eco 2013 measures 16,2 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 14,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the ThunderJet Havasu 2010 at 2,0 feet (2010). At 26 lbs and 107 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the ThunderJet V162-Eco 2013 has a 65-hp advantage over the ThunderJet Havasu 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the ThunderJet V162-Eco 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 5 gallons in the ThunderJet Havasu 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The ThunderJet Havasu 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the ThunderJet V162-Eco 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the ThunderJet Havasu 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The ThunderJet Havasu 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the ThunderJet V162-Eco 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.