Matching a modified vee ThunderJet Bull Dog 20 ft. 2013 against a deep vee ThunderJet Luxor Offshore 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — ThunderJet Bull Dog 20 ft. 2013 at 2,0 ft versus ThunderJet Luxor Offshore 2012 at 2,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the ThunderJet Luxor Offshore 2012 tips the scales at 215 lbs — 182 lbs less than the ThunderJet Bull Dog 20 ft. 2013 at 33 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 320 hp, the ThunderJet Bull Dog 20 ft. 2013 has a 70-hp advantage over the ThunderJet Luxor Offshore 2012's 250-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 48 gal and 48 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The ThunderJet Bull Dog 20 ft. 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the ThunderJet Luxor Offshore 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the ThunderJet Bull Dog 20 ft. 2013 and its 320-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the ThunderJet Luxor Offshore 2012 with its 250-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.