ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 boat specs
ThunderJet
ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 boat specs
ThunderJet
ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013
2013
View full specs →

ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 vs ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 and the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 measures 22,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 20,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 at 2,0 feet (2010). At 18 lbs and 42 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 tops out at 320 hp. Engine specs for the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 5 gal and 8 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 at 22,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeThunderJet
MakeThunderJet
ModelAlexis OB
ModelRio Classic
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam102 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise16° Entry: 45°
Deadrise14°
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - Detail4,200 lbs
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - kg1905.09
Weight - lbs.18
Weight - lbs.42
Width [transom] - Detail72 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 78 in
Height [transom]34 in
Height [transom]35 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet22
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Inches24
Length overall - Inches264
Height - Detailnot available
Height - DetailSides: 35 in
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.89
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thicknessSides: 0.125 in. Bottom: 0.25 in. Transom: 0.19 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeJet Drive
Engine makenot available
Engine makeGM
Engine modelnot available
Engine model350 cid multi-port fuel injected Vortec
Exhaustnot available
ExhaustCatalyzed exhaust with KLS mufflers and intake water strainer (sand trap)
Impellernot available
ImpellerTurbo
Jet pumpnot available
Jet pumpHamilton Jet 212 axial flow with JT nozzle, split duct reverse and close coupling
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower320 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGateway 8,300 lb. capacity galvanized tandem axle bunk

ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 vs ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 or the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013?
The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 20,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 or the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013?
For trailering, the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 has the edge at 18 lbs dry weight versus 42 lbs for the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 has a documented max rating of 320 hp. Engine specifications for the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 or the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013?
The ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 has the bigger tank at 8 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 and ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the ThunderJet Alexis OB 2010 and the ThunderJet Rio Classic 2013 are built by ThunderJet. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.