ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 boat specs
ThunderJet
ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 boat specs
ThunderJet
ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012
2012
View full specs →

ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 vs ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 against a modified vee ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 at 17,5 ft versus ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 at 19,0 ft. At 17 lbs and 24 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 tops out at 32 hp. Engine specs for the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 carries 48 gallons versus 34 gallons in the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 and ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeThunderJet
MakeThunderJet
Model176 Eco Jet
ModelNE Envoy
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in
Beam84 in
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches84
Deadrise8&#176
Deadrise12°
Weight - Detail1,700 lbs
Weight - Detail2,400 lbs
Weight - kg771.11
Weight - kg1088.62
Weight - lbs.17
Weight - lbs.24
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in
Height - DetailSides: 31 in
Height - DetailSides: 31 in
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Inches31
Height - Inches31
Height [transom]31 in
Height [transom]31 in
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches228
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. Bottom: 0.19 in. Transom: 0.19 in
Hull thicknessSides: 0.160 in. Bottom: 0.250 in. Transom: 0.190 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeKodiak
Engine makenot available
Engine model2.4 l PFI 4-cylinder Vortec
Engine modelnot available
Jet pumpAmerican Turbine SD 203 axial flow
Jet pumpAmerican Turbine SD309 mixed flow
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail48 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters181.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal48
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeJet Drive
Drive typeJet Drive
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard350 cid multi port fuel injected GM Vortec, closed cooling system
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower32
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGateway 2,600 lb. capacity galvanized single axle
Trailer - DetailGateway 5,300 lbs. capacity galvanized tandem axle bunk

ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 vs ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 or the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012?
The ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 or the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012?
For trailering, the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 has the edge at 17 lbs dry weight versus 24 lbs for the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 has a documented max rating of 32 hp. Engine specifications for the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 measures 86" wide, compared to 84" for the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 or the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012?
The ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 has the bigger tank at 48 gallons, versus 34 gallons on the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013. That 14-gallon difference translates to roughly 42–70 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 and ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 and the ThunderJet NE Envoy 2012 are built by ThunderJet. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.