Matching a deep vee ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 against a modified vee ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 measures 24,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 6,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 at 17,5 feet (2013). At 17 lbs and 25 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 tops out at 250 hp. Engine specs for the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 carries 48 gallons versus 34 gallons in the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the ThunderJet Landing Craft CC 24 ft. 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 24,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The ThunderJet 176 Eco Jet 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.