Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010
2010
View full specs →

Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 vs Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 and the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 at 17,0 ft versus Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 at 16,0 ft. At 122 lbs and 46 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 135 hp, the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 has a 95-hp advantage over the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 and its 135-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeSylvan
MakeSylvan
ModelPro Sport 1700 DC
ModelSuper Snapper 1600 T
Model Year201
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam91 in
Beam70 in
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Inches91
Beam - Inches7
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inches22
Weight - Detail1,220 lbs
Weight - Detail460 lbs
Weight - kg553.38
Weight - kg208.65
Weight - lbs.122
Weight - lbs.46
Width [transom] - Detail90 in
Width [transom] - Detail63 in
Height [transom]LS
Height [transom]LS
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches1
Length - Inches5
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Meters5.21
Length overall - Meters5
Length overall - Inches205
Length overall - Inches197
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.86 in
Hull thickness0.06 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Max no of engines1
Max no of engines1
Fuel tank capacity - Detail31 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters117.35
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max135 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,350 lbs
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 vs Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 or the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010?
The Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 or the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010?
For trailering, the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 has the edge at 46 lbs dry weight versus 122 lbs for the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 is rated to a maximum of 135 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 measures 91" wide, compared to 7" for the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 and Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sylvan Pro Sport 1700 DC 2010 and the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 are built by Sylvan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.