Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013
2013
View full specs →

Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 vs Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 — Which Pontoon Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 and the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 measures 20,8 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 18,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 at 2,0 feet (2009). At 185 lbs and 185 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 24 gal and 24 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSylvan
MakeSylvan
ModelMirage 820 4
ModelMirage Fish LE 8520 CNF
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam102 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail1,850 lbs
Weight - Detail1,850 lbs
Weight - kg839.15
Weight - kg839.15
Weight - lbs.185
Weight - lbs.185
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet20.83
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Meters6.17
Length overall - Meters6.35
Length overall - Inches243
Length overall - Inches25
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter23 in
Tube diameter25 in
Tube gauge0.080 in
Tube gauge0.080 in
Number of tubes2
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Max no of engines1
Max no of enginesnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp
Engine max115 hp Tri-toon Maximum: 150 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeBRP
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelE90DPL
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Maximum capacity1,990 lbs
Maximum people12
Maximum people1

Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 vs Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 or the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013?
The Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 18,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 or the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013?
For trailering, the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 has the edge at 185 lbs dry weight versus 185 lbs for the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 and Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 24 gallons and 24 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 and Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sylvan Mirage 820 4.0 2009 and the Sylvan Mirage Fish LE 8520 CNF 2013 are built by Sylvan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.