Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010
2010
View full specs →

Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 vs Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 and the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 at 16,0 ft. At 85 lbs and 46 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 has a 35-hp advantage over the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeSylvan
MakeSylvan
ModelExplorer 1600 SC
ModelSuper Snapper 1600 T
Model Year2009
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam82 in
Beam70 in
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Inches82
Beam - Inches7
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches22
Weight - Detail850 lbs
Weight - Detail460 lbs
Weight - kg385.55
Weight - kg208.65
Weight - lbs.85
Weight - lbs.46
Width [transom] - Detail77 in
Width [transom] - Detail63 in
Height [transom]LS
Height [transom]LS
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches2
Length - Inches5
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters5
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches197
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.080 Side: 0.070 Rib: 0.08
Hull thickness0.06 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Max no of engines1
Max no of engines1
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,275 lbs
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 vs Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 or the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010?
The Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 or the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010?
For trailering, the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 has the edge at 46 lbs dry weight versus 85 lbs for the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 measures 82" wide, compared to 7" for the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 and Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sylvan Explorer 1600 SC 2009 and the Sylvan Super Snapper 1600 T 2010 are built by Sylvan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.