Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007
2007
View full specs →

Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 vs Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 against a pontoon Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 measures 22,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 10,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 at 12,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 tips the scales at 225 lbs — 204 lbs more than the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 has a 100-hp advantage over the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 is rated for 14 passengers, while the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 14 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSylvan
MakeSylvan
ModelAlaskan 1300 DLX
ModelMirage Signature 8522 F-N-C
Model Year201
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam66 in
Beam102 in
Beam - Meters1.68
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches66
Beam - Inches102
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail225 lbs
Weight - Detail2,100 lbs
Weight - kg102.06
Weight - kg952.54
Weight - lbs.225
Weight - lbs.21
Width [transom] - Detail56 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]LS / SS
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet12
Length - Feet22
Length - Inches11
Length - Inches3
Length overall - Detail12 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters3.94
Length overall - Meters6.78
Length overall - Inches155
Length overall - Inches267
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.06 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typePontoon
Engine and Drivetrain
Max no of engines1
Max no of engines1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp
Engine max125 hp Tri Toon (Max): 150 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Operational Info
Maximum capacity700 lbs
Maximum capacity2,200 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people14
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter25 in
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge0.080 in
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2

Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 vs Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 or the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007?
The Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 comes in at 12,0 feet, making it roughly 10,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 or the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007?
For trailering, the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 has the edge at 21 lbs dry weight versus 225 lbs for the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 is rated to a maximum of 125 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 is certified for 14. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 measures 102" wide, compared to 66" for the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 and Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sylvan Alaskan 1300 DLX 2010 and the Sylvan Mirage Signature 8522 F-N-C 2007 are built by Sylvan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.