Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan Jon 1032 2012
2012
View full specs →

Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 vs Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 vs Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 measures 16,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 15,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 at 1,0 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 tips the scales at 115 lbs — 114 lbs more than the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 at 1 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 has a 37-hp advantage over the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012's 3-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 3 lbs per hp for the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSylvan
MakeSylvan
Model816 Mirage Fish
ModelJon 1032
Model Year2005
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam51 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters1.3
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches51
Weight - Detail1,150 lbs
Weight - Detail100 lbs
Weight - kg521.63
Weight - kg45.36
Weight - lbs.115
Weight - lbs.1
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet1
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail10 ft
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Meters3.05
Length overall - Inches195
Length overall - Inches12
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail16 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters40.64
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches16
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail50 in
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter23 in
Tube diameternot available
Tube gauge.080 in
Tube gaugenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - DetailOPT
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max40 hp
Engine max3 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum capacity290 lbs
Maximum people8
Maximum people2
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.05 in. Side: 0.05 in. Rib: 0.05 in
Hull typenot available
Hull typeFlat

Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 vs Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 or the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012?
The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 comes in at 1,0 feet, making it roughly 15,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 or the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012?
For trailering, the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 has the edge at 1 lbs dry weight versus 115 lbs for the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 tops out at 3 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 is certified for 2. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 3 lbs per hp for the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 measures 96" wide, compared to 51" for the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 and Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sylvan 816 Mirage Fish 2005 and the Sylvan Jon 1032 2012 are built by Sylvan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.