Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 boat specs
Sylvan
Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005
2005
View full specs →

Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 vs Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 vs Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 measures 24,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 8,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 at 16,0 feet (2005). At 97 lbs and 19 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 has a 25-hp advantage over the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 24 gal and 24 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 is rated for 14 passengers, while the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 14 passengers and at 24,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeSylvan
MakeSylvan
Model1600 Avenger SC
Model824 Mirage Cruise RE
Model Year2005
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches9
Beam - Inches96
Depth - Detail23 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches23
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail970 lbs
Weight - Detail1,900 lbs
Weight - kg439.98
Weight - kg861.82
Weight - lbs.97
Weight - lbs.19
Width [transom] - Detail87 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height - Detail32 in
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.81
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches32
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]LS
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet24
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters7.39
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches291
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches3
Body / Hull
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.080 Side: 0.076 Rib: 0.08
Hull thicknessnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp
Engine max115 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum capacity2,400 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people14
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter23 in
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge.080 in

Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 vs Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 or the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005?
The Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 is the longer of the two at 24,0 feet overall. The Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 8,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 or the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005?
For trailering, the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 has the edge at 19 lbs dry weight versus 97 lbs for the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 is certified for 14. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 measures 96" wide, compared to 9" for the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 and Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 24 gallons and 24 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 and Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Sylvan 1600 Avenger SC 2005 and the Sylvan 824 Mirage Cruise RE 2005 are built by Sylvan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.